Service
New Continuation Application Preparation/Filing (Micro Entity)
This service is for a Basic Quality Continuation Patent Application (Utility) Preparation & Filing at our Micro entity reduced fee level.
In our basic (lowest cost) Continuation Application Prep./filing service, we are not performing any claims or specification drafting work. Instead, you simply indicate or provide us which claims should be included in the CA (usually valuable or broader matter that was either amended away during prosecution to get quicker allowance, or embodiments in the specification that were never claimed).
If you want the ‘Basic’ continuation services level, please add this service to your cart, and do the full checkout/intake process to indicate to us that you want that work to be done as well. Otherwise, please ask for a quote if you think you have some more extensive situation requiring claims scope analysis based on certain business goals you may have in mind.
The base fee for this ‘Basic’ CA patent is for simple situations for lightly amending up to 10 claims, wherein we solely make very limited edits of the allowed set of claims for a continuation patent application (no new matter) based on client’s proposed elements to add/remove. Higher levels of service are available upon request and separate quoting, which can include our searching for potentially valuable things to claim based on the original specification and/or prosecution history of this case.
If any claims restrictions were
ever issued in your application then you will have to also order our
Divisional Patent application service which usually costs the same as this basic CA
service.
Our general guidance regarding doing a Continuation application vs a CIP
It is highly advised that you file a "continuation patent application" (CA or CPA) to keep your options open after the patent issues in case you need to add additional/better claims that cover errors/oversights in the original filing, which is esp. important if you expect knock-off products/services, licensing/investment deals, etc. Otherwise, you risk your patent protection not covering products/services you would have wanted it to, especially against unforeseen situations that evolve in the marketplace. Please take note that when you have ongoing business in the area of the patent it is usually very wise to keep the patent chain alive by filing a "Continuation Patent Application" (CA) with different claims but no new invention information. Moreover, when there are invention improvements you want protected, then you should do what is referred to as a "Continuation in Part" (CIP), which is like a child patent application that gets the priority benefit to the original parent filing for the things in common, but allows you to add novel claims and description of valuable things to again try to win patent protection of as before.
See here for explanations of what a CIP is:
Another benefit of filing a CIP, as with a CA, is that it keeps the original patent chain pending for a good while so that as you discover improvements or if there is an infringement case, you have many more options to more optimally expand/strengthen your patent strategy, which is very often critical to winning against savvy competitors/copyists. In effect, the like the CA, the CIP enables you to continually add novel improvements to the methods/features of your original filing. This CIP filing not only broadens your patent scope but it keeps open your legal options to broaden the patent if infringers find a loop-hole in the parent patent's claims. This CIP be filed before the filing of the issue fee paperwork and payment. Usually, you would want to add all your improvements to the invention/product/ methods/features of the original filing. If you did want to do the CIP, the cost is usually much lower than the original patent application work because the additions are usually just incremental. You should generally allow at least 2 months lead time to start the CIP work just to be very safe; that is, our CIP work generally has 60 day turnaround times, so given the below noted strict timing requirements, you should not delay if you want to do it.
If you did have something new to claim that was in the original disclosure, but are unsure if a CIP is needed, then you should question if the original patent spec/figs fully defines something (e.g., a design or feature)that was not ever claimed, then a continuation (not CIP) is the best way to go, where we will simply draft new claim(s) covering that in the original patent application is usually the best and cheapest. However, if the original disclosure only mentions this unclaimed design/aspect/feature without all the needed details (and drawings) showing how to make it and use it for the intended purpose, then a CIP adding those details would be the best approach.
In summary: if the original patent spec/figs fully defines something (e.g., a design or feature)that was not ever claimed, then a CIP is not the best way to go, but having us draft new claim(s) covering that in a continuing patent application is usually the best and cheapest. However, if the original disclosure only mentions this unclaimed design/aspect/feature without all the needed details (and drawings) showing how to make it and use it for the intended purpose, then a CIP adding and claiming those new details would be the best approach
NOTE: quoting particular situations can take us several weeks and doing the new filing work in another 3-6 weeks total is not unusual. That said, please note that we are not responsible for any quoting delays which cause any kind of issues with meeting any deadlines. Hence, if and when the deadline is within 6-8 weeks away, we strongly recommend you either be a ‘squeaky wheel’ calling it to speed along the quoting process or just directly order the Basic service and delay any higher levels of service (and paying the difference for upgrading) until after filing the continuation because further amendments can be done as a preliminary amendment after filing the continuation without any penalties or impacts. Same goes for CIP work as well.
For a CIP work (i.e., adding new matter/claims to your original patent application) our fees start at around $900-$1200 for the simplest, almost "as is" filing, and goes up from there depending on how much material you want to add and/or claim, and what work we must do. CIPs must always be quoted in advance of our accepting the work. So for a CIP quote, please edit your new material and/or corrections into our original WORD document specification that we filed (using ‘tracked changes’ so we can see what is new) along with any new drawings you want to add and a list of the new key elements you want to claim.
For both a CA and CIP, for more accurate quoting and better achieve your overall protection goals, please complete/return our claims guidance form
For continuations (CA or CIP), you can help lower our work (and hence our fee) by identifying for us the remaining invention features you believe are valuable to pursue in the continuation. Please ask for a quote if you are interested, along with such input if you have it to offer.
NOTE: Under United States patent law, a continuing patent application is a normal Utility patent application that follows, and claims priority to, an earlier-filed patent application. A continuing patent application may be one of three types: a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part. Although continuation and continuation-in-part applications are generally available in the U.S. only, divisional patent applications are also available in other countries, as such availability is required under Article 4G of the Paris Convention.
NOTE- regarding NEW MATTER: No new matter is allowed in a continuation patent application (CA); hence, we will be filing the original specification and drawings. Only the claims may be changed. See the CIP options if you want to add new matter to the specification.
NOTE: A common misconception about a CIP/CA is to think that if you enter a request for continuation, that means the grant status is delayed until the CIP or CA is allowed. Fortunately, the answer is absolutely no. They are completely independent of each other. The CIP and CA only points back (i.e., gets benefit priority) to the original patent if filed before issuance fee payment, otherwise you lose your CIP right and your issued patent then becomes prior art against any subsequent patent app filing you do. When you already have real business interests in place, or products on/imminent on the market, it is very unwise to not file a CIP, given how cheap it is to keep many offensive and defensive options open, and it enables you to later correct errors/omission you may discover as critical down the road. That is our take on the subject, of course, the financial opportunity/cost choice is up to you.
Pricing
| Price | 600.00 |
|---|
| Minimum pre-payment | 40 |
|---|
View the original dynamic service page